|
|
|
|
|
|
Review of the year 2002 |
|
Highlights |
|
Real sector |
|
Financial sector |
|
Public sector |
|
External sector - foreign trade & payments |
|
Outlook for 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Barbadian economy showed signs of recovery
during the second half of the year. |
|
However, overall real GDP dipped slightly during
the year. |
|
Decline in the net international reserves. |
|
Larger fiscal deficit than that of last year. |
|
High level of liquidity in the banking system. |
|
Low inflation rate. |
|
Marginally higher unemployment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GDP fell by an estimated 0.4%, as compared
to a 2.8% decline in 2001. |
|
|
|
Traded sector output was down 2.2%, following a
7.3% drop a year earlier, |
|
As large contractions in tourist arrivals in the
first two quarters overshadowed a pick-up in the last two. |
|
|
|
Activity in the non-traded sectors rose 0.4%,
compared to a decline of 0.9% a year earlier. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tourism value-added decreased by 1.9% in 2002,
compared to a decline of 5.9% in 2001. |
|
Long-stay and cruise arrivals were down 1.8% and
0.8%, respectively. |
|
However, the contraction was not as sharp as it
could have been, due to a second half upturn in arrivals. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following a decrease of 14.7% last year, sugar
production contracted by a further 10.0% to 44,818.7 tonnes in the 2002 crop season. |
|
|
|
Contributing factors were: |
|
Diminished acreage of cane planted. |
|
Drought conditions during the planting season. |
|
|
|
|
|
Output in the manufacturing sector was flat,
contrasting with a fall of 8.1% in 2001. |
|
|
|
This was partially attributed to benefits from: |
|
The “Buy Local” campaign. |
|
The 60% tariffs on selected imports. |
|
|
|
The food processing and miscellaneous
manufacturing industries recorded growth, while the other sub-sectors
contracted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-sugar agriculture and fishing output
decreased by approximately 3.2%, following a 6.0% contraction a year ago. |
|
|
|
Fish catches declined by 9.3% |
|
Milk production shrank by 6.8% |
|
Chicken production fell by 0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-traded output registered 0.4% growth during
2002, after contracting by 0.9% in 2001. |
|
Government output of services rose 3.1% to
compensate for weak private sector activity. |
|
Construction declined by 3.6% as a result of
reduced private sector building activity. |
|
Mining and Quarrying decreased by 5.4% due to a
10.7% decline in oil production. |
|
Wholesale and Retail fell by less than 1.0%
because of the second-half upturn in tourism. |
|
|
|
|
|
The rate of inflation for 2002 was negligible,
compared to a rise of 2.8% in 2001. |
|
|
|
Declines were recorded in the retail prices of
fuel and light, household operations and supplies, and clothing and
footwear. |
|
However, there were moderately higher prices for
food, alcoholic beverages and tobacco, housing, and medical and personal
care. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic deposits expanded by an estimated 9.1%
or $356.9 million, after a rise of 6.1% ($224.5 million) in 2001. |
|
This was spurred largely by: |
|
Weak demand for private sector credit. |
|
A draw-down of Government deposits at the
Central Bank ($316.2 million). |
|
Capital gains by LOB shareholders following the
sale to Mutual. |
|
|
|
|
Abstracting from the incorporation of an
offshore loan portfolio involving $147.3 million into the domestic system,
commercial bank credit to the non-financial private sector contracted by
approximately 0.6% ($16.3 million) during the year. |
|
This contrasts with an increase of 0.3% ($8.4 million)
over the comparable period a year ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The excess liquidity ratio rose to 19.0% at
year-end, up 8.3 percentage points from December 2001. |
|
|
|
The treasury bill rate slid to 1.51% by end-December
this year from 1.97% at the end of 2001. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The overall fiscal deficit was estimated at
$273.4 million (5.4% of GDP), compared to $184.0 million (3.6% of GDP) in
2001. |
|
Higher expenditure due to counter-cyclical
capital expenditure and higher public sector wages and consumption. |
|
Lower revenue as a result of a decline in
corporate tax receipts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue decreased by about 1.6%, following
growth of 2.1% a year ago. |
|
|
|
Direct tax receipts fell by 8.4%. |
|
Property taxes declined by 9.5%. |
|
Corporate taxes plunged by 20.8%. |
|
Personal taxes rose by 3.7%. |
|
Indirect tax revenue grew by 0.3%. |
|
Import duties jumped by 23.6%. |
|
VAT increased by 2.9%. |
|
Excise taxes fell by 26.3%. |
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenditure rose by 3.2% over the period,
compared with an 8.0% increase a year earlier. |
|
The 1.2% rise in current expenditure reflected a
higher wages bill and increased consumption. |
|
counter-cyclical spending by Government pushed
capital expenditure up by 20.8%. |
|
Net lending decreased by $19.5 million (94.9%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The NIR declined by approximately $83.1 million,
compared to underlying growth of $145.5 million in 2001. |
|
This was largely due to declines in travel
credits and domestic exports, as well as reduced long-term private capital
and financial inflows. |
|
Nevertheless, at year-end the stock of reserves
amounted to over $1.3 billion, representing: |
|
35.2 weeks of goods imports cover |
|
31.4 weeks of imports of goods and services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current account deficit was an estimated
$246.3 million (4.9% of GDP), compared to $187.7 million (3.7% of GDP) in
2001. |
|
|
|
Domestic exports fell by 6.6%, following a 7.1%
drop a year ago, as all the major categories of commodity exports
contracted. |
|
|
|
Net foreign receipts from services decreased by
5.1%, compared to a 2.7% decline in 2001. |
|
This was attributed mainly to the downturn in
the tourism sector, as travel credits fell by 2.4%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained imports decreased by 1.9%, following an
8.2% decline last year. |
|
|
|
Capital goods imports recorded the largest
contraction (4.0%), followed by imports of intermediate goods (2.7%) and
consumer goods imports (0.2%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Capital Account registered a surplus of
approximately $123.6 million, which was significantly below the surplus of
$570.6 million in 2001. |
|
Net long-term private sector capital inflows
were $157.3 million below the level last year |
|
The 2001 figure was boosted by Government
borrowings of $300 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming
no external shock occurs (e.g. war on Iraq), real economic activity is
projected to grow by around 2.0% in 2002. |
|
driven by continued growth in tourism, an
improved sugar crop and modest growth in manufacturing. |
|
In the event of a war, real GDP growth could be
constrained within a range of –1% to –2.5%, depending on the length of the
war. |
|
|
|
|
|
The traded sectors are forecasted to expand by
about 3.0%. |
|
Tourism activity is projected to increase by
5.0% over the year. (around -3%) |
|
The non-traded sectors should increase by around
1.6%. |
|
|
|
|
The average rate of unemployment should decline
slightly, in line with increased economic activity. |
|
The inflation rate is forecasted to increase to
around 1.5%. A US-Iraqi war might, however, give rise to higher oil prices
and hence higher inflation of between 3.9% and 4.5%. |
|
|
|
|
The NIR is forecasted to contract by
approximately $49.4 million, compared to $83.1 million in 2002. |
|
However, under the assumption that there is a
war, the predicted decline in the NIR rises to between $99.0 million and
$165.2 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
A modest decline in the overall fiscal deficit to
around 4.6% of nominal GDP is expected for 2003. However, the deficit could
rise as high as 6.2% of GDP in the event of a war. |
|
The anticipated rise in private sector activity
should help to increase Government revenue from corporate taxes and reduce
the need for counter-cyclical spending by Government, provided that there
is no war. |
|
However, the fiscal reforms outlined in the 2002
budget session will mean lower personal tax collections. |
|
The deficit is likely to be financed primarily
from the domestic banking system. |
|
|
|
|
In the case of a return to growth, a modest
pick-up in credit and a slowdown in the growth of domestic deposits are
expected, which would lead to a reduction in excess liquidity over the
coming year. |
|
However, under the war scenario private sector
credit could decline sharply, thus offsetting the effect of the slowdown in
domestic deposit growth. There would therefore be very little impact on
liquidity. |
|
|
|